Review of Tree Predicate Rules
∃D. The constant, a, must be new to the branch [here the computer will choose for you]
∀D. Any closed term, stage 1, your choice
2/3/08 10 Software
Your browser is not displaying the Deriver applet. Try downloading Deriver itself by clicking on the link elsewhere on the page.
11/4/08 10Software
To become familiar with the new rules for predicate logic trees.
M.Bergmann, J.Moor, J.Nelson, [2004] The Logic Book Chapter 9
There are further rules for predicate logic trees (which we will come to shortly).
10/7/09
There are the ordinary (non-modal) tree propositional rules plus
The Modal Negation (MN) rules
There are the ordinary (non-modal) tree propositional rules plus
The Modal Negation (MN) rules
There are the ordinary (non-modal) tree propositional rules plus
The Modal Negation (MN) rules
5/26/09 10Software
M.Bergmann, J.Moor, J.Nelson, [2008] The Logic Book Chapter 4
Bergmann [2008] has a number of exercises. Many of them you will be able to do in the Applet below.
Here are a few hints
1/25/09
[This is a Quicktime Movie, click the Play button to view it. The logical symbols you see in use may be different to the ones you are familiar with (sorry about that, but it is not practical to produce different movies for all the minor variations in symbols). Any differences will not affect the principles being explained here.]
5/18/09 09 Software
A central use for Trees is to produce a counter example to an invalid argument. To do this, you construct a tree with a complete open branch. You will be able to do this for invalid arguments (but not valid ones). Then you run up that branch assigning all atomic formulas True and all negations of atomic formulas False.
This applet will let you try a few.
5/18/09