Help with Conditional Proof
6/1/09
Conditional Proof
6/1/09
6/1/09 10 Software
Learning conditional proof.
Bergmann[2008] The Logic Book Section 5.1 and 5.4
The five remaining core sentential rules of inference are slightly more difficult than the ones that we have met before. They are slightly more difficult in that they require you to make new assumptions, and the correct new assumptions at that. However they follow a similar pattern to each other so mastery of one should lead to mastery of the others.
5/19/09 10Software
9/4/06
This movie shows the downloadable application being used, but the manipulations are so similar to those of the web page applet that it really covers both.
5/18/09 10Software
Proving an argument to be valid by displaying a derivation. Simple sentential derivations using some of the Rules of Inference.
Bergmann[2004] The Logic Book Section 5.1.
If you suspect that an symbolized argument might be valid, you should attempt to give a derivation of it.
A derivation is a proof of validity.
5/18/09
Review of new material
There are the truth-tables for the connectives...
Negation
F ∼F True False False True
Conjunction
2013
You need to know some propositional logic to be able to understand the tutorials to come. In particular, you need to know about the symbols used in propositional logic, truth tables, satisfiability, consistency, and semantic invalidity (by counter example). You do not need to know propositional rules of inference and derivations.
Howson [1997] will give you enough background.
Alternatively you could look at the first five propositional tutorials in Easy Deriver
Welcome!
The tutorials presented here look at some topics in logic to the level of intermediate to advanced Predicate Calculus. They build on the Tutorials of Easy Deriver which provided the introductory material to Propositional and Predicate Calculus.
The program, widgets, or Notes, should be accompanied by a suitable textbook, such as: