# howson

## Tree Tutorial 8 Modal Trees

Topic
Logical System
###### 1/31/20

Colin Howson, [1997] Logic with trees Chapter 12 Section 2

The Howson [1997] does not expand on modal logic (and modal trees) so a text like

Rod Girle [2000] Modal Logics and Philosophy

would definitely be a help here.

### Tutorial

[Modal logic is a vast area, what is being presented here is the briefest of glimpses through the shop window (a book like the Girle would help you go further).]

Topic
Logical System

## Exercise: Finding a counter-example.

Notation martin Thu, 02/11/2010 - 11:02
Logical System

2013

The Colin Howson book uses a notation like R(a,b,c) for the application of a predicate R to the arguments or terms a, b, c.

It employs the upper case letters A-Z, perhaps followed by subscripts, to be predicates, so, for example, R, S₁, T₁ are all predicates.

The software supports this.

But the software makes an extension.

Often, when working informally, authors will write Red(x) to mean that the predicate Red is applied to the variable x.

Set Theory (and Russell's Paradox) martin Sat, 12/19/2009 - 08:49
Topic
Logical System

2013

Colin Howson, [1997] Logic with trees Chapter 11

### Tutorial

Set theory is an extensive topic introduced elsewhere. It can be written as a first order theory.

There is one axiom schema, Abstraction (or Comprehension), which can generate infinitely many axioms

Number Theory and Peano Arithmetic martin Fri, 12/18/2009 - 14:39
Topic
Logical System

2013

Colin Howson, [1997] Logic with trees Chapter 9 & 11

### Tutorial

#### Notation

It is common in this setting (which is arithmetic) to use  functional terms like s(x), s(1), s(0) to mean the successor of x, 1, and 0, respectively. Equally common is the notation x', 1', and 0' to mean the same thing. The latter is quicker and shorter (though not semi-nmemonic)-- we will use it here.

Groups martin Wed, 12/16/2009 - 23:36
Topic
Logical System

2013

Colin Howson, [1997] Logic with trees Chapter 9

### Tutorial

Groups can be characterized by three proper symbols {=,+,0} (ie identity, one infix operator, we will use '+', and an identify element '0') and the three proper axioms

Tree Tutorial 6: Functional Terms and First Order Theories martin Wed, 12/16/2009 - 13:29
Topic
Logical System
###### 6/5/12

Colin Howson, [1997] Logic with trees

### Tutorial:

The word 'terms' in logic means 'names' and thus far we have met two kinds of terms: constants (or proper names), and variables.

Tree Predicate Exercises: Roll your own martin Tue, 12/15/2009 - 01:14
Topic
Logical System

2013

Colin Howson, [1997] Logic with trees Chapter 2

### Exercises

Howson [1997] has a number of exercises. Many of them you will be able to do in the Widget below.

Here are a few hints

Review of Tree Predicate Rules martin Wed, 10/07/2009 - 10:33
Topic
Logical System

#### ∀D. Any closed term, stage 1, your choice

Preliminary [Pre-test] martin Mon, 03/16/2009 - 22:37
Topic
Logical System

2013

You need to know some propositional logic to be able to understand the tutorials to come. In particular, you need to know about the symbols used in propositional logic, truth tables, satisfiability, consistency, and semantic invalidity (by counter example). You do not need to know propositional rules of inference and derivations.

Howson [1997] will give you enough background.

Alternatively you could look at the first five propositional tutorials in Easy Deriver