Review 2
Review of material presented thus far
Review of new material
There are the truth-tables for the connectives...
Negation
F ∼F True False False True
Conjunction
Review of new material
There are the truth-tables for the connectives...
Negation
F ∼F True False False True
Conjunction
1/7/13
Your browser is not displaying the Deriver applet. Try downloading Deriver itself by clicking on the link elsewhere on the page.
9/16/12
To learn how to symbolize arguments, and how to judge whether they might be invalid using truth-table methods.
We wish to appraise arguments, to do this we have to symbolize them first. Judging the invalidity of arguments by truth-table methods is not particularly important, but it does help to develop skills involving truth and lists of formulas.
8/29/06
Your browser does not support html5 video.
-->
1/24/06
The problem or issue here lies with the truth table for the conditional (or material implication) ⊃
9/15/12
To learn how compound propositions are true or false depending on the truth or falsity of their component propositions.
There is the idea of setting up a code or convention or dictionary between atomic propositions and capital letters.
There are compound propositions, each of which has a main connective which connects its components.
There are five propositional logical connectives:
'∼' which translates back to 'it is not the case that...'
'∧' which translates back to '... and ...'
'∨' which translates back to '... or ...'
'³' which translates back to 'if... then ...'
'≡' which translates back to '... if and only if ...'
9/1/12
Symbolizing compound propositions. Learning about logical connectives, and the notion of the main connective. Recognizing different constructions in English which have the same underlying logical form. Paraphrasing the English into a standard form.
It is the next step in learning how to symbolize. Main connectives are very important-- they are central to symbolization, they are central to the semantics, and they are central to derivations.