Help with Tutorial 2
8/29/06
Tutorial 2 Example: How Experts Symbolize
Your browser does not support html5 video.
-->
[This is a film-- press the 'play' symbol.]
8/29/06
Your browser does not support html5 video.
-->
[This is a film-- press the 'play' symbol.]
9/1/12
Symbolizing compound sentences. Learning about logical connectives, and the notion of the main connective. Recognizing different constructions in English which have the same underlying logical form. Paraphrasing the English into a standard form.
It is the next step in learning how to symbolize. Main connectives are very important-- they are central to symbolization, they are central to the semantics, and they are central to derivations.
[This is a film-- press the 'play' symbol.]
To become familiar with the notions of argument, valid, invalid, premise, and conclusion. To learn how to symbolize atomic sentences.
Bergmann[2004] The Logic Book Chapter 1
The main role of logic is to assess arguments-- to say whether an individual argument is valid or whether it is invalid. In logic, arguments are taken to consist of two components--premises, and a conclusion.
For example,
Indicative sentences in a natural language, English, for instance, are either true or false. For example, 'There are 35 State Governors in the U.S.A.' is an indicative sentence (which happens to be false).
Indicative sentences can be atomic or compound. 'There are 35 State Governors in the U.S.A.' is an atomic sentence; whereas 'There are 35 State Governors in the U.S.A. and there is one President of the U.S.A. ' expresses a compound sentence composed of two atomic sentences (one false one and one true one).
Welcome!
These web pages provide an introduction to logic to the level of Propositional and Predicate Calculus.
The focus of the program is on arguments and the question of whether they are valid. Arguments have the form <list of premises> ∴<conclusion>. An argument is valid if and only if it is not possible for all its premises to be true and its conclusion false at one and the same time; an argument which is not valid is invalid.
2013
To learn how to use the Universal and Existential Quantifiers in symbolizing propositions.
In Predicate Logic there are two new logical connectives, the Universal Quantifier (∀x) and the Existential Quantifier (∃x). These are used for symbolizing certain English constructions (they also have their own rules of inference and their own semantics, which we will learn about later).
11/30/06
[The core of this is from Leblanc and Wisdom [1972] p.117 and f.]
2013
Thus far we have considered only 'monadic' predicates-- our atomic formulas consist of a predicate followed by only one term-- for example, Fx. But in English we regularly encounter dyadic predicates or relations. For example, 'Arthur is taller than Bert' cannot be symbolized with the tools we have used so far; what is needed is a relation to represent '...is taller than ...' Txy, say, and then the proposition would be symbolized Tab.
2013
To learn how to use the Universal and Existential Quantifiers in symbolizing propositions.
In Predicate Logic there are two new logical connectives, the Universal Quantifier (∀x) and the Existential Quantifier (∃x). These are used for symbolizing certain English constructions (they also have their own rules of inference and their own semantics, which we will learn about later).