Review of K Propositional Rules
There are the ordinary (non-modal) tree propositional rules plus
The Modal Negation (MN) rules
There are the ordinary (non-modal) tree propositional rules plus
The Modal Negation (MN) rules
10/7/09
There are the ordinary (non-modal) tree propositional rules plus
The Modal Negation (MN) rules
There are the ordinary (non-modal) tree propositional rules plus
The Modal Negation (MN) rules
7/27/08 10 Software
None really: this is merely to give you a whiff of the topic of trees for modal logic.
Colin Howson, [1997] Logic with trees Chapter 12 Section 2
The Howson [1997] does not expand on modal logic (and modal trees) so a text like
Rod Girle [2000] Modal Logics and Philosophy
would definitely be a help here.
10/7/09
There are the ordinary (non-modal) tree propositional rules plus
The Modal Negation (MN) rules
Rod Girle [2000] Modal Logics and Philosophy Chapter 3
S4 has the rules
{Non-modal propositional rules + Modal Negation + ◊R + □R+ □T+□□R}
These are described in Review of S4 Rules.
The extra rule (over T) is the Rule □□R and what it allows you to do it this. Without it (but with the other rules) you could reason from
□F (n)
10/7/09 10Software
Rod Girle [2000] Modal Logics and Philosophy Chapter 3
T has the rules
{Non-modal propositional rules + Modal Negation + ◊R + □R+ □T}
These are described in Review of T Rules.
There are the ordinary (non-modal) tree propositional rules plus
The Modal Negation (MN) rules